[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Fwd: Re: Fwd: CGM:1999 defect
CGM Open members -- Attached please find the contents of a defect which I just submitted to SC24 for CGM:1999. If you have any problems, comments, or correction, please let me know immediately. The ISO committee is meeting this week. If you are a user of MetaCheck, I am informed that MetaCheck 5.18 does the correct check, even though CGM:1999 had it specified wrong. This is because MC 5.18 was being released around the time the original defect (8632:1992-1/065) was being processed and CGM:1999 published. The ad hoc technical group got the solution right, and it went into MC correctly, but into the final CGM text (and defect report text) incorrectly. -Lofton. >X-Sender: lofton@terminal.rockynet.com >X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.2 >Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 10:50:11 -0600 >To: Steve Carson <carson@gscassociates.com>,puk@igraphics.com, > 100434.3031@compuserve.com >From: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com> >Subject: Re: Fwd: CGM:1999 defect >X-RCPT-TO: <lofton@rockynet.com> > >Hi Everyone, > >Here is the defect which should be processed. You'll need to fuss around >with some details, such as the "Secretariat" and the dates. Please let me >know if you need anything else. > >Thanks, >-Lofton. > > > >******************* >Lofton Henderson >1919 Fourteenth St., #604 >Boulder, CO 80302 > >Phone: 303-449-8728 >Email: lofton@rockynet.com >*******************Title: Reflectance
1 |
Defect Report Number: 8632:1999-1/001 |
2 |
Submitter: Henderson |
3 |
Addressed to: JTC1/SC 24/WG 6 Rapporteur Group on ISO/IEC 8632, CGM |
4 |
WG secretariat: ??? |
5 |
Date Circulated by WG secretariat: DD MMM 2001 |
6 |
Deadline on response from editor: :DD MMM 2001 |
7 |
Defect Report concerning IS 8632:1999 Computer Graphics: Metafile for the storage and transfer of picture description information (CGM) Part 1, Functional specification. |
8 |
Qualifier (e.g. error, omission, clarification required): Correction |
9 |
References in document (e.g. page, clause, figure and/or table numbers): clause 7.6.24, page 177; clause 7.6.25, page 178. |
10 |
Nature of defect (complete, concise explanation of the perceived problem):
There is a mistake in each of the Description sections, for NUBS and NURBS. In the Description section of clause 7.6.24, the last sentence of the 2nd paragraph says: "The end value shall be less than the n-th knot value (where n is the number of control points). In the Description section of clause 7.6.25, the last sentence of the 3rd paragraph says: "The end value shall be less than or equal to the n-th knot value (where n is the number of control points).The two statements are inconsistent, and both are incorrect. The correct statement in both cases is: "The end value shall be less than or equal to the (n+1)st knot value (where n is the number of control points)." Note: this latter sentence is as agreed by a technical committee examining problems with the NUBS & NURBS specifications prior to the 1999 republication of ISO/IEC 8632. However the agreed correction was not accurately reflected in the defect report, 8632:1992-1/065, nor in the final text of ISO/IEC 8632:1999. |
11 |
Solution proposed by the submitter (optional): Replace the last sentence of the 2nd paragraph of the Description section of 7.6.24, and the last sentence the 3rd paragraph of the Description section of 7.6.25, with the sentence: "The end value shall be less than or equal to the (n+1)st knot value (where n is the number of control points)." |
12 |
Editor's response (any material proposed for processing as a technical corrigendum to, an amendment to, or a commentary on the International Standard or DIS final text is attached separately to this completed report): Amend the standard as proposed above. |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC