FW: [chairs] Oasis document identifiers - conclusion?

[Carlisle Adams <carlisle.adams@entrust.com>]

Title: FW: [chairs] Oasis document identifiers - conclusion?

Hi all,

At Eve's request, I'm forwarding this to the chair's list (I hadn't done this initially because I don't feel too strongly about this, but thought it was worth registering a vote with Eve...).

Carlisle.

-----Original Message-----
From: Eve L. Maler [mailto:eve.maler@sun.com]
Sent: Monday, January 06, 2003 12:55 PM
To: Carlisle Adams
Subject: Re: [chairs] Oasis document identifiers - conclusion?

Makes sense to me!  (Now I don't know which side of the fence I'm on.
:-)  Would you be willing to send this reasoning to the whole list?

        Eve

Carlisle Adams wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It seems to me that the status is the most important piece of
> information.  TCs can come and go (at least in theory; in practice, many
> stick around forever!).  So, in a few years, the name/identifier of the
> TC that produced the spec is much less relevant to anybody than knowing
> whether something is an OASIS Standard, a Committee Specification, or
> just a working draft.
>
> Since the proposals contain both pieces of information, I can live with
> either.  However, my preference is to highlight the important
> information by putting it first in the document name.
>
> Carlisle.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Eve L. Maler [mailto:eve.maler@sun.com]
> Sent: Monday, January 06, 2003 12:33 PM
> To: Carlisle Adams
> Subject: Re: [chairs] Oasis document identifiers - conclusion?
>
> Thanks for weighing in, Carlisle.  Any particular reason behind your
> preference?
>
>         Eve
>
> Carlisle Adams wrote:
>  > Hi Eve,
>  >
>  > I prefer starting with "draft-" or "cs-", but I could live with starting
>  > with the TC name/identifier if this is the consensus.
>

--
Eve Maler                                        +1 781 442 3190
Sun Microsystems                            cell +1 781 354 9441
Web Technologies and Standards               eve.maler @ sun.com