[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: [chairs] Re: Quorum required for good standing
| > That may be true in theory, but in the practice, when in a 20 person TC | > an email vote elicits 2 yes votes and 1 no vote and the rest either | > send "I abstain" messages or none at all, people are quite reluctant | > to consider the matter settled in favor of the motion. Most would say, | > and have said, that the vote doesn't and shouldn't count. | | If everyone else abstains or can't be bothered voting, doesn't that | mean they don't care about the result of that vote? So why shouldn't | it count? That's how it's supposed to work, and that's how in f2f meetings it actually does work. This is called a majority vote (p. 395): Majority Vote -- the Basic Requirement As stated on page 4, the basic requirement for approval of an action or choice by a deliberative assembly, except where a rule provides otherwise, is a _majority vote_. The word _majority_ means "more than half"; and when the term _majority vote_ is used without qualification -- as in the case of the basic requirement -- it means more than half of the votes cast by persons legally entitled to vote, excluding blanks or abstentions, at a regular of properly called meeting at which a quorum is present. This works fine for everyone else. Why are we screwing around with the basic concept of a majority? Jon
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC