Re: [chairs] SCM plans?

[Frederick Hirsch <frederick.hirsch@nokia.com>]

This can be a big deal for those in corporations with locked-down  
firewalls.

regards, Frederick

Frederick Hirsch
Nokia



On Oct 21, 2005, at 1:25 PM, ext Wachob, Gabe wrote:

> Ostensibly, subversion has some chance of working through corporate  
> HTTP
> proxy-only firewalls, whereas CVS doesn't.
>
>     -Gabe
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Norman Walsh [mailto:ndw@nwalsh.com]
>> Sent: Friday, October 21, 2005 10:22 AM
>> To: chairs@lists.oasis-open.org
>> Subject: Re: [chairs] SCM plans?
>>
>> / "Duane Nickull" <dnickull@adobe.com> was heard to say:
>> | Then we should focus on the SCM first.  CVS?
>>
>> Subversion?
>>
>> Among subversion's nice features are the fact that commits are atomic
>> and the fact that you can rename files and directories (preserving
>> their history) with the standard tools. (Renaming a directory or file
>> on CVS basically involves administrative access to the directory
>> containing the repository.)
>>
>> I've also heard interesting things about Arch and Mercurial which
>> have a more distributed model.
>>
>>                                         Be seeing you,
>>                                           norm
>>
>> -- 
>> Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM / XML Standards Architect / Sun
>> Microsystems, Inc.
>> NOTICE: This email message is for the sole use of the intended
>> recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information.
>> Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is
>> prohibited.
>> If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by
>> reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.
>>
>