[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [chairs] TC FAQ Template
On Mon, 13 Feb 2006 jon.bosak@sun.com wrote: > [robin@oasis-open.org:] > > | a) spam in the comment list archives may suggest to a casual > | reader that the comment form facility is broken, or otherwise > | unsiutable as a mean of getting an answer to a question > > Virtually all of the comments received on the UBL comment list are > spam. We were promised a fix to this months ago. (I can't > imagine what that fix could be, but that's what we were promised.) > > | Within OASIS Staff, I am now trying to create consensus around the > | position that OASIS should support archived, two-way communication > | (discussion, dialogue) between the TCs and the public. Clarify "support" to mean "allow" -- rather than "disallow," as seems to be the case with the revised TC Process document that prohibits use of the comment facility for discussion. > If that creates the expectation that we're going to have time to > answer questions, a lot of people are going to be disappointed. > We refer questions about UBL to the ubl-dev list and let the user > community handle them as they will. No such expectation/obligation would be intended, and none should be created by the designation of any such forum as a publicly accessible discussion forum. [...] -rcc
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]