OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

chairs message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: Re: [chairs] Membership for open source implementers


David

I completely agree. I guess I had that in mind when I was writing what I 
said, but just didn't say it!

For example, I work on OSS implementations of OASIS specs, but my 
company is funded and pays its OASIS dues.

So I certainly think that this should be based on need, and if people 
are doing this work for the benefit of their company, then the company 
should join OASIS.

Another thing that OASIS could do - in addition - is to offer a small 
set of Open Source foundations, such as Apache, free membership.

Paul



David RR Webber (XML) wrote:
> Paul,
>  
> This simply cannot be the sole criteria - there are so many companies 
> now doing open source implementations - and of course my TC is a point 
> in case - where the open source implementation is contributed by a major 
> corporation.
>  
> The real criteria here is that an individual contributor - is facing 
> hardship in meeting the membership fee - and then the fee can be waved 
> descretionary.
>  
> If someone is going to all the effort of writing a solution - have an 
> open public specification for that - that they have been able to 
> contribute to and have their implementation optimize - 9 times out of 10 
> the membership fee is a no-brainer to promote that.
>  
> DW
> 
> "The way to be is to do" - Confucius (551-472 B.C.)
> 
> 
>     -------- Original Message --------
>     Subject: Re: [chairs] Membership for open source implementers
>     From: Paul Fremantle <paul@wso2.com>
>     Date: Thu, April 05, 2007 5:30 pm
>     To: Gabe Wachob <gabe.wachob@amsoft.net>
>     Cc: chairs@lists.oasis-open.org
> 
>     Gabe
> 
>     I completely agree. I think that any committer on any project actively 
>     implementing an OASIS specification under an OSI license should be able 
>     to apply for a Open Source Membership free-of-charge.
> 
>     Personally I don't think this is going to cost OASIS any loss of income, 
>     but it certainly will encourage a wider view of OASIS standards.
> 
>     Paul
> 
>     Gabe Wachob wrote:
> 

-- 
Paul Fremantle
VP/Technical Sales, WSO2
OASIS WS-RX TC Co-chair

http://bloglines.com/blog/paulfremantle
paul@wso2.com
(646) 290 8050

"Oxygenating the Web Service Platform", www.wso2.com



[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]