OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

csaf message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]

Subject: [OASIS Issue Tracker] (CSAF-30) CSD01 WD01 Review comments from Beth Pumo

     [ https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/CSAF-30?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Stefan Hagen updated CSAF-30:

    Assignee: Omar Santos  (was: Stefan Hagen)

> CSD01 WD01 Review comments from Beth Pumo
> -----------------------------------------
>                 Key: CSAF-30
>                 URL: https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/CSAF-30
>             Project: OASIS Common Security Advisory Framework (CSAF) TC
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: CSAF_CVRF
>    Affects Versions: 1.2_CSD01_WD01
>         Environment: [Proposed]
>            Reporter: Stefan Hagen
>            Assignee: Omar Santos
>            Priority: Minor
>              Labels: editorial
>             Fix For: 1.2_CS01_WD01
> We received one TC internal comment with purely editorial content ("no technical corrections/comments") from Beth Pumo ( https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/csaf/201707/msg00003.html ) that the editor intents to implement as non-material changes revision as candidate for balloting and further progression in the OASIS standards creation process. 
> """
> Copied from mail:
> We have no technical corrections/comments but we do have a few minor updates:
> *    Typo on – “The value Produzct Name of Branch Type indicates the name of the product.”
> *    Syntax: The plural of Product ID is “Product IDs”, not the possessive form “Product ID’s” (2.2.4.n)
> *    Syntax: Remove the “:” from the end of Product Tree Model – Grouped:
> *    Semantics: The non-normative comment for [CSAF-2.215-1] should read: “The -final- two **vulnerability involvement** status states, ….” Reason: since presumably Completed and Disputed are also a final status state based on the statement that open or in-progress documents should eventually be issued as Disputed or Completed. 
> *   Syntax: The plural forms of OID and MIB are “OIDs” and “MIBs” respectively, not the possessive form “OID’s” and “MIB’s” (4.4 Document Publisher).
> *    Formatting of indent for vuln:Notes on page 59
> """

This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]