[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [cti-stix] Timestamps - Proposal
Good questions.... For (2) I would hope that where relevant STIX will support multiple time stamps to accomplish this need. But at the current rate, that will probably be 9 months of debate... :( For (3), it is always easier to add stuff than take stuff away. And the group kind of felt like you either know to the microsecond or not. Now some 10Gig/40Gig/100Gig networks will have support for nano second, but there did not seem to be any solid use-cases for mili second precision. If I am wrong, PLEASE speak up. We need to drive this to consensus. We need to show that we can decide something... So if you think we need milliseconds, and there are a broad range of tools that only support 3 sub-digit seconds, then please speak up. From my standpoint, I really do not see the value in precision. Or I should say, I only see value to a "day" and to greater than an "hour". Anything outside of those windows is basically useless from an actionable stand point. But I am coming to middle ground in order to get something done in STIX. Thanks, Bret Bret Jordan CISSP Director of Security Architecture and Standards | Office of the CTO Blue Coat Systems PGP Fingerprint: 63B4 FC53 680A 6B7D 1447 F2C0 74F8 ACAE 7415 0050 "Without cryptography vihv vivc ce xhrnrw, however, the only thing that can not be unscrambled is an egg."
|
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]