[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [cti-taxii] TAXII Architecture
I think we are in violent agreement. This is why I posited we do not say “MUST be a repository.” However, we do need to have a minimal set of useful features, of which the repository set is a reasonable place to be. I also think there should not be that much beyond what a repository would want to be a broker. If there is, then we are most likely talking two different protocols.
|
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]