[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [cti-users] Re: [EXT] Re: [cti-users] CTI Python libraries and Python 2.6
[+1] on Python 2.7 and 3.x as baseline support bars. While I believe 2.7 support is a must for a number of reasons, I personally would deprecate 2.6 support. Patrick Maroney Principal Engineer - Data Science & Analytics Wapack Labs LLC (609)841-5104 On Apr 10, 2017, at 3:40 PM, Bret Jordan <Bret_Jordan@symantec.com> wrote: I guess I would ask the question this way, for this community. For those implementing a STIX 2.0 and TAXII 2.0 solution, who will be using the MITRE libraries, which version of Python would you prefer: 1) 2.6 2) 2.7 3) 3.x Bret From: cti-users@lists.oasis-open.org <cti-users@lists.oasis-open.org> on behalf of Terry MacDonald <terry.macdonald@cosive.com> Sent: Monday, April 10, 2017 1:30:26 PM To: Back, Greg Cc: cti-users@lists.oasis-open.org; Raphaël Vinot Subject: [EXT] Re: [cti-users] CTI Python libraries and Python 2.6 I think we can lose python 2.6, but I agree that python 2.7 will be around for a while. Cheers Terry MacDonald On 11/04/2017 02:57, "Back, Greg" <gback@mitre.org> wrote: I would love for the libraries to be 3.3+ only, and I agree that it is prudent for people to start planning a migration from Python 2 to Python 3 now, before 2020. I’m thrilled that MISP is already switching to be Python 3 only. |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]