[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [cti] Some additional thoughts on combining STIX and CybOX
On 18.03.2016 12:05:51, Mark Davidson wrote: > > Can we talk through this on the upcoming Tuesday working session? > I agree, Mark; this should be THE topic for tomorrow's working session. We simply must put this issue to bed so we can move on. > > For me, a key process that we need to define is how CybOX objects > are managed. If we move toward this proposal, perhaps the CybOX SC > can propose a process? I think that the process is going to be as > important as the initial set of CybOX 3.0 objects. > Ivan and I will dig into John Wunder's proposal and propose the aforementioned process. -- Cheers, Trey -- Trey Darley Senior Security Engineer 4DAA 0A88 34BC 27C9 FD2B A97E D3C6 5C74 0FB7 E430 Soltra | An FS-ISAC & DTCC Company www.soltra.com -- "With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. However, this is not necessarily a good idea. It is hard to be sure where they are going to land, and it could be dangerous sitting under them as they fly overhead." --RFC 1925
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]