On 8 December 2016 at 00:50, John-Mark Gurney <jmg@newcontext.com> wrote:
Bret Jordan (CS) wrote this message on Wed, Dec 07, 2016 at 18:57 +0000:
> Based on this discussion, and information we have learned from it, if we keep our current timestamps then we need to add some bounds checking to the number of sub-second digits so as to not break digital signatures.
Can you explain more about this? As timestamps are a text field, I do
not see how this can break digital signatures.
As long as nobody adds redundant zeroes to the end, it should be fine, I think.
--
John-Mark
------------------------------------------------------------ ---------
To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_ workgroups.php
Dave Cridland
Participate | Collaborate | Innovate
Surevine Limited, registered in England and Wales with number 06726289. Mailing Address : PO Box 1136, Guildford GU1 9ND
If you think you have received this message in error, please notify us.