[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [cti] Re: [EXT] Re: [cti] Location Object
Am 15.08.18 um 23:34 schrieb Trey Darley:
On 15.08.2018 19:42:52, Bret Jordan wrote:To quote you, well, Trey, that is your opinion. Everyone has one.Bret - To quote your oft-repeated refrain, we in the CTI TC leadership must endeavor to ensure that the community's voices are heard. To wit - and I repeat myself - given that a great many CTI TC members are currently out on summer holiday, I respectfully insist that we refrain from removing location precision (previously discussed and reviewed at length by the TC) until September when folks come back from summer holiday. Unless you've reconsidered your position, we should hold off until the TC regains quorum. If you no longer agree with the notion that the TC community's voices must be heard and given due consideration, then we can have an altogether different discussion.
time is on our side, if the actively participating community members come back to the table. My take is: Although the time field discussions put my patience to a hard test, a constant factor of 1000 in a plausible maybe even dominant use case reads good to me ;-) All the best, Stefan -- stefan-hagen.website
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]