Regrets for June 21 [was: [dita-adoption] Revision DITA Adoption TC Meeting Minutes -- 7 June 2010]

["Grosso, Paul" <pgrosso@ptc.com>]

And unfortunately I will be on an airplane during next Monday's
telcon, so I will have to give my regrets for that one too.

paul

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Grosso, Paul [mailto:pgrosso@ptc.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, 2010 June 09 14:17
> To: DITA Adoption TC
> Subject: RE: [dita-adoption] Revision DITA Adoption TC Meeting Minutes
> -- 7 June 2010
> 
> Sorry I had to miss this week's telcon.  Some comments below.
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Joann Hackos [mailto:joann.hackos@comtech-serv.com]
> > Sent: Monday, 2010 June 07 12:49
> > To: DITA Adoption TC
> > Subject: [dita-adoption] Revision DITA Adoption TC Meeting Minutes
--
> 7
> > June 2010
> >
> > Minutes for the DITA Adoption TC meeting
> > Committee meeting - 7 June 2010, 11 am to 12 am ET
> >
> > Roll call - Gershon Joseph, JoAnn Hackos, Marc Speyer, Deb Bissantz,
> > Frank Miller, Bruce Nevin, Troy Klukewich, Chris Goolsby, Briana
> > Wherry.
> >
> > Regrets from Paul Grosso, Joe Gelb, Donald Rohmer, Bryan Schnabel
> 
> 
> > 4. ITEM: Discussion of the Tools Awareness article begun by
Su-Laine.
> > Considered the feasibility of preparing such an article to be within
> > the domain of the Adoption TC. All in agreement.
> 
> I have reviewed Su-Laine's article below in the past, and I had
> no problems with it.
> 
> > Discussed a sequence
> > of activities starting with this article on tools awareness,
followed
> > by a tools evaluation checklist (Gershon as responsibility), a test
> > suite (possibly with Anna R), and, eventually, a certification body.
> > Discussed that the certification body would have to be outside the
> > control of the TC as an independent organization.
> 
> I am not sure just what was discussed or decided, but I have concerns
> as I indicated briefly in my email at
>
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/dita-adoption/201004/msg00014.html
> to which there was no reply.  I would want to be part of any further
> discussions about any test suite and/or certification thoughts that
> this TC may have.  I'm not convinced that this TC's time and effort
> would be best spent with such things.
> 
> paul