Re: [docbook-apps] ...but no template matches.

["Bob Stayton" <bobs@sagehill.net>]

Well, it seems this element has a long tradition of being ignored by the 
stylesheets.  8^)
The citebiblioid element was added in DocBook 4.2, which is about 5 years 
old.  As far as I can tell, it has never been handled by the XSL 
stylesheets.  I can't find any bug reports that include that element name 
in the summary line on SourceForge either.  I'm mystified that no one 
noticed before.

Could someone please file a bug report on SourceForge to get this included? 
Thanks.

Bob Stayton
Sagehill Enterprises
DocBook Consulting
bobs@sagehill.net


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Kilian" <winkelklammern@texttheater.de>
To: "Thomas Schraitle" <tom_schr@web.de>
Cc: <docbook-apps@lists.oasis-open.org>
Sent: Sunday, November 04, 2007 11:34 AM
Subject: Re: [docbook-apps] ...but no template matches.


>> You wrote you don't use a customization layer so I suppose it has
>> something to do with a missing namespace or the like. Do you use
>> XIncludes?
>
> No, I don't.
>
> I grepped all of the stylesheets - the string "citebibloid" does not 
> occur at all. Is it possible that not all of the DocBook 5.0 elements are 
> supported yet by DocBook XSL?
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: docbook-apps-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: docbook-apps-help@lists.oasis-open.org
>
>
>