Re: [docbook-apps] Canonical DocBook

[Frank Steimke <f-steimke@berger-und-steimke.de>]

OK, i see. Not so easy.

However, i never wanted to be unfair to anyone. My hope or expectation 
was that the stylesheets are already available, because we have XslTNG. 
We have the stylesheets for preprocessing in XslTNG, but we do not have 
a documentation of the DocBook subset they produce.

But of course, when someone writes it down, there will be a discussion 
about the target format, someone will suggest a "better" solution which 
leads to a change request for the stylesheets ...

Frank

Am 27.02.22 um 12:29 schrieb Dave Pawson:
> On Sun, 27 Feb 2022 at 11:20, Frank Steimke
> <f-steimke@berger-und-steimke.de> wrote:
> > What would be a better way to accomplish this?
> >
> > Ask Norm to document its internal format so that a particular community
> > can choose it as the "de facto standard" for developing own stylesheets
> > based on it?
> Not sure at all Frank.
>     Democratic solution perhaps? Majority of TC support A vs B?
> Then rely on Norm (mmmm) to write appropriate stylesheets? Seems unfair IMHO
>
> regards