[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [docbook-tc] DocBook Publishers documentation
"Hudson, Scott" <Scott.Hudson@schneider-electric.com> writes: > SH: Do you want to just paste from the spec, or do you have source somewhere I'll start by pasting from the spec, I think. I don't have this work checked in anywhere yet. >> Right. We could make a refentry page for each one, but that seemed >> like overkill. I should probably just format that list as a table with >> the one line description and a link or something. > SH: there's a description of each in the spec. We could just use that? Yes, that makes sense. >> It appears that the content model for info is "bag of DocBook stuff" >> OR "bag of dcterms stuff". No mixing. Is that the intent? (Not that I >> think it's successfully articulated because the DocBook stuff allows >> *:*.) > SH: Yes, that is correct. either or, no mixing. Hey, good. I like that. >>> HTML tables were explicitly removed from Publishers, though there is a >>> request to add them back in, it is not part of the approved schema. >> >> Ah. Just fumble fingered on my part, I think. Fixed now :-) >> >> Publishers removes informaltable but leaves informalfigure and >> informalexample? That's intentional, is it? >> > SH: hm. informaltable should still be in, according to the spec... Ah, it's listed as both included and excluded. I grabbed the excluded list. I'll "put it back". Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | Of all lies, art is the least http://www.oasis-open.org/docbook/ | untrue.-- Flaubert Chair, DocBook Technical Committee |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]