Subject: Re: Small problem with DocBook 5.1
Chet Ensign <email@example.com> writes: > This sounds like it is not a substantive change, correct? Correct. I just needed to tweak the build tool so that it would produce namespace declarations in the format that Schematron requires for embedded Schematron. I've also, in the spirit of complete honesty, tweaked a few other bits of documentation in the schemas (a couple of typos, and some new metadata elements for building the documentation). > Since you > need to replace the existing schemas with new ones, we will need to > run another vote to approve the Committee Specification again but it > can be done as a non-material change ballot so that there is no need > for another review or anything. Ok, perfect. Can you setup that ballot? And what materials do I need to provide? Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Walsh <firstname.lastname@example.org> | So, are you working on finding that bug http://nwalsh.com/ | now, or are you leaving it until later? | Yes.
Description: PGP signature