Re: [docbook] <simplesect> question

[Dalan Hurst <d@webbscreek.us>]

 > A section without title... how does it appear? How is it listed in
 > TOC? I guess you just want to graphically separate some major part of
 > text from another.


It would not appear in the TOC as the two beats are dependent on the 
larger context and not independent units (though they are independent of 
one another, hence the <simplesect>).  These breaks are a bit more than 
merely a graphical separation, as I've said there is a semantic 
difference between these two sections of prose, which, as you state, is 
normally presented to the reader as whitespace.  However, if this were 
merely a presentation issue, I would use <para>  with a role attribute 
and be done with it, but the simplesect (or at least a sect of some 
kind) is warranted, though, with the empty <title>s, a little inelegant.

Anyway, I'm fine with the current schema, I just thoguht I'd see if it's 
possible to get it changed.


thanks,
Dalan Hurst