[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: Un-proposal: Remove model="async" envelopes
ciao,
Christine
Jeff Parham wrote:
Given that we're including support for "raw" DsmlRequest/DsmlResponse elements in DSMLv2, I no longer see a compelling reason to support model="async" envelopes. (See my mail titled "Proposed DSML 2 schema changes," dated 8/7/2001 for background on model="async".) I.e., it seems rational that async transports would use DsmlRequest/DsmlResponse elements, and request-response transports (like the SOAP and LDIF-replacement transports) would use DsmlEnvelopeRequest/DsmlEnvelopeResponse elements (in an implied model="sync" mode).Does anyone object to my withdrawing my proposed model attribute on DsmlEnvelopeRequest envelopes and asserting all envelopes are request-response?Thanks,-J
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC