Re: [dss-x] JMS transport binding

["kuehne@trustable.de" <kuehne@trustable.de>]

Hi Pim,

JMS binding sounds interesting, especially for the intranet integration 
application. In our implementation we started with full blown secured 
SOAP implementation. But a JMS implementation sounds like a much 
simplier task.

Can you supply some information how the request / response data are 
binded to the JMS call ?

Greetings

Andreas
> Hello,
>
> A customer I am working with is using JMS (as interface to Oracle's Advanced
> Queuing to be precise) as transport protocol for DSS.  For interoperability
> reasons (this project is currently using a homegrown DSS implementation but
> is likely to want to move to a supported product over time) I would like to
> know if:
> (i)   anyone else is aware of interest in (or even practical use of) DSS
> over JMS?
> (ii)  people feel it is likely that current/future DSS implementations will
> want support DSS?
> (iii) there would be interest in a standard profile for DSS over JMS (and
> derivatives like AQ ..)
>
> Where the ebXML profile is really about cross-enterprise (B2B/G2G)
> environments, this profile would support the enterprise (EAI) environment
> where queuing interfaces are very common due to the reliability and
> scalability of these interfaces.  Potential applications are (high volume)
> document scanners, document management systems, archiving systems etc. that
> want to interface to a DSS service.
>
> Right now in this project this is a very simple interface, but there are
> issues like e.g. handling attachments that a profile could help define and
> standardize.  
>
> Pim
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
> generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
> https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php 
>
>
>
>