RE: [dss] freezing doc, and next steps

[Robert Zuccherato <robert.zuccherato@entrust.com>]

Nick;

It seems to me that at least for the signature verification and timestamping
protocols, a number of the submissions, including Entrust's comes fairly
close.  Of course, nothing is going to have all of the requirements exactly,
but they could be used as good starting points.

I guess the question then is, do we want to have three separate protocols
(one for signature generation, one for signature verification and one for
timestamping), or do we want to have one protocol that includes
functionality to support all three?  

	Robert.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nick Pope [mailto:pope@secstan.com] 
> Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2003 3:49 PM
> To: Trevor Perrin; Juan Carlos Cruellas; dss@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject: RE: [dss] freezing doc, and next steps
> 
> 
> I would say that we have to use the requirements document as 
> the starting
> point.  None of these documents match what was in the 
> requirements document.
> 
> Nick
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Trevor Perrin [mailto:trevp@trevp.net]
> > Sent: 22 May 2003 18:51
> > To: Juan Carlos Cruellas; dss@lists.oasis-open.org
> > Subject: [dss] freezing doc, and next steps
> >
> >
> > At 04:30 PM 5/20/2003 +0200, Juan Carlos Cruellas wrote:
> >
> > >Dear all,
> > >
> > >As version 6 of the document on requirements has been 
> issued I think that
> > >we could try to raise comments as soon as we have had time to
> > read it in order
> > >to have an idea of how far we are of freezing it . This 
> would allow to
> > >elaborate a more suitable agenda for the next meeting.
> >
> > I'd be happy with freezing it soon.  Not that it's perfect, 
> but I think
> > it's helped clarify things enough that we're ready to get into
> > detailed work.
> >
> > Robert raised good questions about what the next steps should be.
> >  Maybe we
> > should discuss these on-list, and try to make some 
> decisions at the next
> > meeting:
> >   - should we use a submission as a starting point?
> >   - should we start with a face-to-face meeting?
> >
> > Below are the submissions I remember, if this helps:
> >
> > Entrust signing, verifying, time-stamping:
> > <http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/dss/200211/msg00003.html>htt
> p://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/dss/200211/msg00003.<http://
lists.oasis-op
> en.org/archives/dss/200211/msg00003.html>html
> 
> ISSE time-stamping:
> <http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/dss/200212/msg00004.html
> >http://lists.
> 
> oasis-open.org/archives/dss/200212/msg00004.<http://lists.oasi
> s-open.org/arc
> hives/dss/200212/msg00004.html>html
> 
> EML time-stamping:
> <http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/dss/200212/msg00012.html
> >http://lists.
> 
> oasis-open.org/archives/dss/200212/msg00012.<http://lists.oasi
> s-open.org/arc
> hives/dss/200212/msg00012.html>html
> 
> Karel Wouters time-stamping:
> <http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/dss/200301/msg00001.html
> >http<http://l
> ists.oasis-open.org/archives/dss/200301/msg00001.html>://lists
> .oasis-open.or
> g/archives/dss/200301/msg00001.html
> 
> Electronic
> PostMark:http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/dss/200302/msg00016.html
> http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/dss/200304/msg00076.html 
> (more recent)
> 
> XAdES:
> http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/dss/200302/msg00028.html
> 
> 
> Trevor
> 
> 
> You may leave a Technical Committee at any time by visiting
> http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/dss/members/leave
> _workgroup.php
> 
> 
> 
> 
> You may leave a Technical Committee at any time by visiting 
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/dss/members/leave_workgroup.php