RE: [dss] time-stamping protocol

["Nick Pope" <pope@secstan.com>]

Trevor,

The requirements document doesn't need to specify what the time-stamping
protocol looks like.  The requirement is that we have a time-stamping
protocol, whether it is just a profile of sign or its own protocol is open.

For the moment in the Core document we do have a separate request / response
for Time-stamping, so the statement does not reflect the current approach
and so I suggest that this is removed.

Nick

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Trevor Perrin [mailto:trevp@trevp.net]
> Sent: 15 August 2003 08:55
> To: dss@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject: [dss] time-stamping protocol
>
>
>
> Right now the requirements doc doesn't say much about the Time-Stamping
> Protocol.  All it says, in 3.1.1, is:
>
> "The Time-Stamping Protocol will most likely be a profile of the Signing
> Protocol, and so won't be discussed separately."
>
> Are people willing to commit to this?  If so, can we add a bullet
> in 3.1.2
> to indicate that we are going to develop a Protocol Profile for XML
> Timestamping?
>
> Trevor
>
>
> You may leave a Technical Committee at any time by visiting
> http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/dss/members/leave_wor
> kgroup.php
>
>
>