[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: dss_requirements_draft_12
At 10:35 AM 8/15/2003 +0100, Nick Pope wrote: >Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > >Trevor, > >The requirements document doesn't need to specify what the time-stamping >protocol looks like. The requirement is that we have a time-stamping >protocol, whether it is just a profile of sign or its own protocol is open. > >For the moment in the Core document we do have a separate request / response >for Time-stamping, so the statement does not reflect the current approach >and so I suggest that this is removed. I removed that sentence from 3.1.1, no other changes: http://trevp.net/dss/dss_requirements_draft_12.pdf http://trevp.net/dss/dss_requirements_draft_12.doc I'll be travelling for the rest of August. I'll try to call in for the meeting, but I won't have seen any discussions on the list. Trevor
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]