Re: [ebxml-bp] Comments on NameID/IDRef and UID and Late Binding and Document References

["David RR Webber" <david@drrw.info>]

Dale,

That's a good description of what is happening.
So clearly the context details at the CPP/A level
are referencing the BPSS directly and abstracting
the context to that business process.

Thanks, DW.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Dale Moberg" <dmoberg@cyclonecommerce.com>
To: "David RR Webber" <david@drrw.info>; "Monica J. Martin"
<Monica.Martin@Sun.COM>
Cc: <martin.me.roberts@bt.com>; <ebxml-bp@lists.oasis-open.org>
Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2004 4:17 PM
Subject: RE: [ebxml-bp] Comments on NameID/IDRef and UID and Late Binding
and Document References


A given software module might make use of a BPSS instance and the
CPPs or CPAs that reference it. Nevertheless, I agree with Monica
that the CPP/As reference the BPSS, and the BPSS instances abstract away
from
CPPA details.

Otherwise, the abstraction layering of the ebXML framework would be
muddied up.


-----Original Message-----
From: David RR Webber [mailto:david@drrw.info]
Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2004 2:11 PM
To: Monica J. Martin
Cc: Dale Moberg; martin.me.roberts@bt.com; ebxml-bp@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: Re: [ebxml-bp] Comments on NameID/IDRef and UID and Late
Binding and Document References


Monica,

My understanding is that the BPSS also draws
the messaging control factors and details from
the CPA.  So in effect - the CPPA selects
the BPSS, but the BPSS engine needs to
reference both together.

Thanks, DW.

>
> mm1: Dave, the CPPA references the BPSS instance used, rather than the
> other way around.
>
>