[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [ebxml-bp] [ebBP] 7/21/2004: Guiding Principles - BPMN and BPSS
Tony, I thought that was BPMI?!? The BPMN is supposed to be the visualization for that? Anyway - we can certainly use it to generate BPSS - and that is what I'm looking at - how to harmonize the BPSS diagrams I've been creating so far - that are loosely based on UML activity diagrams with BPMI - so that people used to creating BPMN can seamlessly cross over to using BPSS.... Cheers. DW Tony Fletcher wrote: >Dear David, > >Sorry, I am about a month behind with email and still desperately trying to >catch up. I suspect you have already discovered the gotcha with the >approach you suggest below: BPMN does not have a (standardised anyway) XML >representation. A task for someone perhaps? > >Best Regards Tony >A M Fletcher > >Cohesions (TM) > >Business transaction management software for application coordination >www.choreology.com > >Choreology Ltd., 68 Lombard Street, London EC3V 9LJ UK >Tel: +44 (0) 1473 729537 Fax: +44 (0) 870 7390077 Mobile: +44 (0) 7801 >948219 >tony.fletcher@choreology.com (Home: amfletcher@iee.org) > > >-----Original Message----- >From: David RR Webber [mailto:david@drrw.info] >Sent: 13 August 2004 18:03 >To: Monica J. Martin >Cc: Tony Fletcher; 'ebXML BP' >Subject: Re: [ebxml-bp] [ebBP] 7/21/2004: Guiding Principles - BPMN and BPSS > > >Tony, > >One possible way to approach this - since we're really talking about >discerning a common subset of functionality - is to use one or more of the >current BPSS models that I have built - and attempt to create the equivalent >in BPMN - but >*NOT* as a BPMN model (pictures) - but as the underlying XML instead. > >If we can crack that - I can update the BPSS model so that it will >automatically emit the equivalent BPMN XML syntax directly. That then of >course could be read back into a BPMN editor - or application that runs >BPMN. > >This would give you "instant" equivalence - and we could document that >accordingly as a Technical Note - including guides to users on the walls and >edges to be aware of when using BPSS in this fashion. > >Thanks, DW. >======================================================================= > >Quoting "Monica J. Martin" <Monica.Martin@Sun.COM>: > > > >>Tony Fletcher wrote: >> >> >> >>>Dear Monica and others, >>> >>>With respect to a possible relationship between BPSS and BPMN, which >>>way around do you think that might be? I am not sure it would be >>>wise to try >>> >>> >>to >> >> >>>extend BPSS to cover everything that BPMN can. However, I would >>>support >>> >>> >>the >> >> >>>idea of a 'profile' of BPMN that restricted the user of BPMN to >>>process diagrams that easily translate into a BPSS description. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>mm1: Actually there would be constructs in ebBP that are not currently >>understood/held in BPMN. I think, although I cannot speak for JJ, that >>he is considering the latter. Thanks. >> >> >> >> > > >http://drrw.net > > >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]