Re: [ebxml-bp] Re: [wsbpel] [uddi-spec] WS-BPEL TN scope OK - but how about working with us on a B2B collaboration TN?

["David RR Webber" <david@drrw.info>]

Monica,

Sure - a cross-TC team here is what I'm seeing - but we definately want the
results of that work to harmonize with the ebSOA - and I think on-going
the ebSOA work is more about how all the parts fit together than obviously
BPSS or ebMS or Registry, et al each from their own perspective.

And just taking this perspective helps people to answer the questions in
a better way than just a localized coupling.

DW

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Monica J. Martin" <Monica.Martin@Sun.COM>
To: "David RR Webber" <david@drrw.info>
Cc: "steve capell" <steve.capell@redwahoo.com>; "'BPSS ebXML'"
<ebxml-bp@lists.oasis-open.org>
Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 2004 9:18 AM
Subject: Re: [ebxml-bp] Re: [wsbpel] [uddi-spec] WS-BPEL TN scope OK - but
how about working with us on a B2B collaboration TN?


> David RR Webber wrote:
>
> >Monica,
> >
> >I think the right "home" for this is the ebSOA specification.  I believe
> >there is very little new to create here - just tying together the pieces
> >coherently - between BCM, BPSS, CPA and Registry work on
> >templates and processes and metadata.
> >
> mm1: I think it would be more beneficial to develop the technical
> note(s) and contribute, as appropriate, David. Regards.
>
>