[ebxml-cppa-negot] BPSS comments

[Martin W Sachs <mwsachs@us.ibm.com>]

After sending my comments on the new BPSS earlier this afternoon, I noticed
the posting below.  I am not sure that I understand "First document
envelope supports "a" & "b". I believe that the statement means the "CPA
Final Response DOC" document is used for both acceptance and reject. I
agree that this can be done.  However, except for this case, a message
receipient can determine success or failure from the business document name
in the message.  For the approach below, we will have to define a separate
success/failure indicator in the message and that indicator will have to be
checked whenever the message is "CPA Final Response DOC". Is there a
technical reason why we have to special-case this message?

Regards,
Marty

*************************************************************************************

Martin W. Sachs
IBM T. J. Watson Research Center
P. O. B. 704
Yorktown Hts, NY 10598
914-784-7287;  IBM tie line 863-7287
Notes address:  Martin W Sachs/Watson/IBM
Internet address:  mwsachs @ us.ibm.com
*************************************************************************************
----- Forwarded by Martin W Sachs/Watson/IBM on 10/15/2002 04:14 PM -----

                                                                                                                                    
                      himagiri@sybase.c                                                                                             
                      om                       To:       "ebxml-cppa-negot@lists.oasis-open.org"                                    
                                                <ebxml-cppa-negot@lists.oasis-open.org>                                             
                      10/14/2002 01:48         cc:                                                                                  
                      AM                       Subject:  [ebxml-cppa-negot] latest ebxml-cppa-negot.zip                             
                      Please respond to                                                                                             
                      himagiri                                                                                                      
                                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                    




 All

Attaching the latest bpss and cpa.

Bpss has the following changes.

1) Added a new document evelope for responding business activity
for final transaction. This is different to what we talked.
This way the response to the request in the final transaction
(Signed or unsigned final CPA) could be three logical choices.
a) Message indicating acceptance b) Message indicating reject
c) Message including double signed CPA.

First document envelope supports "a" & "b" and Second document envlope
supports "c".

What do you guys think of this approach in contrast to having a new
Business Transaction just for sending the final double signed CPA?

I've added support in the CPA for the new transaction.

-hima


**** Attachment ebxml-cppa-negot.zip has been removed from this note on 15
October 2002 by Martin W Sachs ****