FW: [ebxml-cppa-negot] Work item 2 or so -- comments on Kartha andMarty Coimments on draft.doc

[Dale Moberg <dmoberg@cyclonecommerce.com>]

Copying to list also. Dale 

-----Original Message-----
From: Dale Moberg 
Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 8:11 AM
To: 'Martin W Sachs'
Subject: RE: [ebxml-cppa-negot] Work item 2 or so -- comments on Kartha
and Marty Coimments on draft.doc

If we do eventually adapt and modify the Negotiation specification to
deal
with web services negotiation, and a CPA is no longer used,
I think even the process specification might need to be revisited. 

Perhaps CPAs _could_ be used for web services negotiation (that is one
work
item deferred from 2.0), but then it would still be CPA negotiation. 

My point was that if web services groups extend a SOAP features
approach, and combines it with WSDL, they may develop a WSDL++ and
registration approach that differs at least from our negotiation
messages. In
Addition, instead of {proposal, acceptance/counterproposal/rejection},
the flow may be {registration, approval/rejection}.  But maybe we should
hold off on this issue until we get the draft ready. 

Dale 

-----Original Message-----
From: Martin W Sachs [mailto:mwsachs@us.ibm.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2002 10:22 PM
To: Dale Moberg
Subject: Re: [ebxml-cppa-negot] Work item 2 or so -- comments on Kartha
and Marty Coimments on draft.doc





I need to look over Dale's responses in more detail but I have one
immediate rejoinder:

Dale wrote:

   "Dale: I am undisturbed by the CPA_ prefix. It at least indicates
that
we are not advocating use of this process outside CPA negotiation."

We should be advocating eventually using as much as possible of this
specification outside CPA negotiation. Web services is an example if it
eventually includes something to negotiate.  Except for some element
names,
there is really nothing in the negotiation BPSS instance document that
is
particularly dependent on CPA.  However, schedules and workloads being
what
they are, I would not even consider changing the terminology at this
late
date.

Regards,
Marty

************************************************************************
*************

Martin W. Sachs
IBM T. J. Watson Research Center
P. O. B. 704
Yorktown Hts, NY 10598
914-784-7287;  IBM tie line 863-7287
Notes address:  Martin W Sachs/Watson/IBM
Internet address:  mwsachs @ us.ibm.com
************************************************************************
*************


 

                      Dale Moberg

                      <dmoberg@cycloneco        To:
ebxml-cppa-negot@lists.oasis-open.org                                
                      mmerce.com>               cc:

                                                Subject:
[ebxml-cppa-negot] Work item 2 or so -- comments on Kartha and Marty 
                      11/19/2002 03:51           Coimments on draft.doc

                      PM

 

 






Some comments on  Marty's comments on Kartha's comments. Dale


#### Review of Kartha and Marty Coimments on draft.doc has been removed
from this note on November 20 2002 by Martin W Sachs