[ebxml-cppa] Re: **VOTE** BPSS/CPPA issue - #20 (old)

[Arvola Chan <arvola@tibco.com>]

I agree with the proposed change.

-Arvola

-----Original Message-----
From: David Smiley <dsmiley@mercator.com>
To: ebTWG-BPS <ebtwg-bps@lists.ebtwg.org>; ebXML-CPPA
<ebxml-cppa@lists.oasis-open.org>
Date: Thursday, December 13, 2001 7:25 AM
Subject: **VOTE** BPSS/CPPA issue - #20 (old)


>No substantive responses have been received that require
>modifying the proposed change to the specification.
>
>Your vote is needed.
>
>**Do you agree with the proposed change?**
>
>FYI,
>Once approved, the resolution goes into the
>BPSS Issues Log (Pallavi). Then, an editor will be assigned
>to make the changes to the spec prescribed by the resolution.
>
>*************************************************************Old/New issue:
>Old
>Re-numbered for V1.1: 20
>Number: 33
>Date: 4/3
>Originator: QRT
>Line: 841 (Section 6.4.3.1)
>
>Issue:
>
>Can these only be ebXML CPAs?
>
>Suggestion for Change to BPSS Spec:
>
>The text of the specification is unchanged from V.99 to V1.01.
>It reads:
>"Each binary pair of trading partners will be subject
>to one or more distinct CPAs."
>
>Change "will" to "may". Changed text would read:
>"Each binary pair of trading partners may be subject
>to one or more distinct CPAs."
>
>Issue Comments:
>
>Background material:
>Some comments were posted against V0.99
>http://www.ebxml.org/project_teams/jdt/ts/SpecificationSchemaV0.99.pdf.
>The current draft being revised is V1.01
>http://www.ebxml.org/specs/ebBPSS.pdf or
>http://www.ebxml.org/specs/ebBPSS.doc.
>
>David Smiley
>Director of Standards
>Mercator Software
>540.338.3355
>
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------
>To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
>manager: <http://lists.ebtwg.org/ob/adm.pl>