ebxml-cppa message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [Elist Home]
Subject: [ebxml-cppa] A straw man Implementation Architecture document for ebXML
- From: Tony Fletcher <tony.fletcher@choreology.com>
- To: UN/CEFACT TMG General Discussion List<uncefact-tmg-general@listman.disa.org>,Ebxml-Cppa List <ebxml-cppa@lists.oasis-open.org>
- Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2002 10:48:40 +0100
Title: Message
Dear
Colleagues,
I submitted a short
contribution to the recent UN/CEFACT Forum TMG meeting in Geneva which called
for the production of an architecture document for ebXML that would help
implementers understand how all the various implementable components of ebXML
were to be used and how they related to each other. It was agreed that the
needs of implementers was not well served at present. It was noted that
the current architecture specification served a number of different audiences,
particularly other ebXML groups, but did not provide a good implementation view
at present. While this could be added, and there were some
comments submitted as part of the UeB Technical Architecture Technical
Specification review that called for this, it was decided to leave the
current document as the theoretical view, showing how classes of things related,
and to generate a new document which would specify the use and relationship
of the ebXML components in a real system.
Please find attached
a start at a 'strawman' for such a document. I have concentrated on the
'static' arrangement of the component parts. During the meeting Duane
(Nickull) described (and demonstrated) how some of the component parts
might relate dynamically - design time, configuration time and actual run
time. I hope Duane will be able to write up what he was telling us into
this document.
Obvious issues
are:
What status should
this document have? Should it be a Technical Specification with much of
the content normative (and thus have conformance implications for those wanting
to implement more than one of the ebXML specifications) - or should be a
non-normative 'user guide' only?
What structure
should the document have? Are the current headings the best and most
appropriate ones?
Is the title the
best we could choose - anyone have any better suggestions (while keeping to the
intent)?
If the idea of this
document is accepted, I am willing to act as the editor, at least on a temporary
basis (unless anyone else is really keen to take it on, in which case I will not
stand in their way!).
Best
Regards,
Tony
|
Tony
Fletcher
Technical
Advisor
Choreology
Ltd. 13, Austin Friars, London EC2N 2JX UK |
Phone:
|
+44
(0) 20 7670 1787 |
Mobile:
|
+44
(0) 7801 948 219 |
Fax:
|
+44
(0) 20 7670 1785 |
Web: |
www.choreology.com |
Cohesions
1.0™ |
Business
transaction management software for application
coordination |
Work: tony.fletcher@choreology.com
|
Home:
amfletcher@iee.org |
Attachment:
Implementation_Archtecture_01.zip
Description: Zip compressed data
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC