[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: RE: S/MIME
Agreed, my only concern is that S/MIME has an impact on Manifest. Off the top of my head I can't think of any other payload which would do this (maybe compression?). What if the entire envelope were S/MIME encrypted? I expect someone will try this and I don't see anything intrinsically wrong with it nor do I see anything in the spec which would prohibit something like this. Regards, David Fischer Drummond Group. -----Original Message----- From: Dan Weinreb [mailto:dlw@exceloncorp.com] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 12:15 PM To: david@drummondgroup.com Cc: dmoberg@cyclonecommerce.com; ebxml-msg@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: Re: S/MIME Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2001 09:24:14 -0500 From: David Fischer <david@drummondgroup.com> Since SMIME is in the payload, we should probably support it indefinitely -- its just another payload (which unfortunately impacts the Manifest). But isn't this addressed by what Chris Ferris said in earlier mail: The ebMS spec doesn't say anything about the payload intentionally. The reference to S/MIME means that the payload, not the overall "envelope" can be S/MIME encrypted. As for the CPP/A, it's possible that (I don't know enough about S/MIME yet) nothing new is needed; maybe you can express S/MIME encryption just by putting in the appropriate Packaging/CompositeList/Encapsulation element. ---------------------------------------------------------------- To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC