[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: schema in [ebxml-msg] v2.0 rev b, etc.
Arvola, Please see below. Cheers, Chris Arvola Chan wrote: > David: > > > > I am not sure if we really want to leave the following unchanged in the > schema: > > > > 1. > <import namespace="http://www.w3.org/2000/09/xmldsig#" > schemaLocation="http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/ebxml-msg/schema/xmldsig-core-schema.xsd"/> > > 2. > <import > namespace="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" schemaLocation="http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/ebxml-msg/schema/xlink.xsd"/> > > 3. > <import namespace="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" > schemaLocation="http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/ebxml-msg/schema/envelope.xsd"/> > > With respect to #1 above, please see > > http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ebxml-msg/200202/msg00154.html > > I think we should be referencing the official version of > xmldsig-core-schema.xsd instead of the snapshot we have been maintaining > at our web site. IIRC, there was a problem with the schema available at the time w/r/t the version of XSD that it leveraged (being different than that which we were using for v1.0). If the XSD is now compliant with the REC version of XML Schema, then agreed we should be using the normative schema published by W3C for dsig-core. > > With respect to #2 above, I am not able to find any official xlink.xsd > on the W3C web site. We will have to continue to use our own version > located at our web site unless someone can identify the location for an > official version of xlink.xsd. There isn't one:) I've repeatedly pointed this out to colleagues of mine who were involved in the XLink WG. There are experimental versions (like ours) floating around, but for our purposes, what I hacked together is as good as any other (IMO:). We probably want to relocate this one to our OASIS site just to be sure that it stays with the rest of our stuff for now. > > With respect to #3 above, please see > > http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ebxml-msg/200202/msg00056.html > > We may want to use "http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" as the > schema location since that is the official SOAP 1.1 schema. The only > potential issue is that the former includes Annotation and you have > previously mentioned that some parsers used by members of the interop > team cannot deal with Annotation. My take would be that we should point to the "official" schema and let implementations deal with any issues they might have on their own (e.g. copy and strip out annotations). > > I also notice two minor problems in the References section: > > 1. The correct URL for BPSS should be http://www.ebxml.org/specs/ebBPSS.pdf > > 2. Xlink has been a W3C Recommendation since June 27, 2001. See > http://www.w3.org/TR/xlink/ > > -Arvola > > -----Original Message----- > From: David Fischer <firstname.lastname@example.org > <mailto:email@example.com>> > To: Ian. C. Jones (E-mail) <firstname.lastname@example.org > <mailto:email@example.com>> > Cc: ebXML Msg <firstname.lastname@example.org > <mailto:email@example.com>> > Date: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 1:02 PM > Subject: [ebxml-msg] v2.0 rev b > > Ian, > > > > Here is what we have at the moment. I have included both an MSWord > document and a PDF. The PDF has change control off and the MSWord > has it on. > > > > I did not accept the changes from Rev A so both Rev A and Rev > B changes show. In my copy, Rev A changes are in Blue and Rev B > changes are in Red. In MSWord, if you put your cursor over the > change, it will say "David V Fischer" on the Rev A changes and > "David Fischer" on the Rev B changes. It would probably be > appropriate, if anyone wants to make quick comments in the next day > or so, to use the line numbers in the PDF. > > > > I don't think either of these documents is appropriate to vote on. > Arvola said he would review the schema (Appendix A) and let me know > what further changes I need to make to align with his copy. > > > > I don't know where we are on the change control document. I have > not looked at anything since Rev A but I have made a couple of > changes based upon the conference calls and the eMail list (mostly > related to Errata locations and OPTIONAL treatment and Chris' item > 229). The easiest way to see these is to look for changes marked in > red (at least it is red on my PC). > > > > One final thought. If we vote on this and it passes, I would like > to suggest we change the version of the last document to v1.9 and > this one to v2.0. > > > > Regards, > > > > David Fischer > > Drummond Group > > ebXML-MS Editor. >
Powered by eList eXpress LLC