OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

ebxml-msg message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]

Subject: Re: schema in [ebxml-msg] v2.0 rev b, etc.

I am not sure if we really want to leave the following unchanged in the schema:
<import namespace="http://www.w3.org/2000/09/xmldsig#"              schemaLocation="http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/ebxml-msg/schema/xmldsig-core-schema.xsd"/>

<import namespace="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" schemaLocation="http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/ebxml-msg/schema/xlink.xsd"/>

<import namespace="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/"            schemaLocation="http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/ebxml-msg/schema/envelope.xsd"/>

With respect to #1 above, please see

I think we should be referencing the official version of xmldsig-core-schema.xsd instead of the snapshot we have been maintaining at our web site.

With respect to #2 above, I am not able to find any official xlink.xsd on the W3C web site. We will have to continue to use our own version located at our web site unless someone can identify the location for an official version of xlink.xsd.

With respect to #3 above, please see


We may want to use "http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" as the schema location since that is the official SOAP 1.1 schema. The only potential issue is that the former includes Annotation and you have previously mentioned that some parsers used by members of the interop team cannot deal with Annotation.

I also notice two minor problems in the References section:

1. The correct URL for BPSS should be http://www.ebxml.org/specs/ebBPSS.pdf

2. Xlink has been a W3C Recommendation since June 27, 2001. See http://www.w3.org/TR/xlink/


-----Original Message-----
From: David Fischer <david@drummondgroup.com>
To: Ian. C. Jones (E-mail) <ian.c.jones@bt.com>
Cc: ebXML Msg <ebxml-msg@lists.oasis-open.org>
Date: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 1:02 PM
Subject: [ebxml-msg] v2.0 rev b

Here is what we have at the moment.  I have included both an MSWord document and a PDF.  The PDF has change control off and the MSWord has it on. 
I did not accept the changes from Rev A so both Rev A and Rev B changes show.  In my copy, Rev A changes are in Blue and Rev B changes are in Red.  In MSWord, if you put your cursor over the change, it will say "David V Fischer" on the Rev A changes and "David Fischer" on the Rev B changes.  It would probably be appropriate, if anyone wants to make quick comments in the next day or so, to use the line numbers in the PDF.
I don't think either of these documents is appropriate to vote on.  Arvola said he would review the schema (Appendix A) and let me know what further changes I need to make to align with his copy.
I don't know where we are on the change control document.  I have not looked at anything since Rev A but I have made a couple of changes based upon the conference calls and the eMail list (mostly related to Errata locations and OPTIONAL treatment and Chris' item 229).  The easiest way to see these is to look for changes marked in red (at least it is red on my PC).
One final thought.  If we vote on this and it passes, I would like to suggest we change the version of the last document to v1.9 and this one to v2.0.
David Fischer
Drummond Group
ebXML-MS Editor.

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]

Powered by eList eXpress LLC