Re: [egov-registry] Re: eGov regrep eGMS + JUDD

[Farrukh Najmi <Farrukh.Najmi@Sun.COM>]

Diane.Lewis@usdoj.gov wrote:

>Carl, Farrukh,
>
>i am going to be attending an e-gov class in West VA June 14-18th...  i have been offered a job at Dept of Transportation which i accepted so June 25th is my last day at DOJ/EOUSA.  i am going to transfer my OASIS membership... and given that justice data is public domain i believe i can still provide some assistance to the SC.   here are some justice data related sites you might want to consider.   starting in July i can work with you to identify set of data elements based on my current justice data use knowledge.
>
>look forward to continued dialogue with all .  i just will be in another physical location and adding to my knowledge of U.S. federal data.   my new employer is aware of my participation in OASIS.  cheers.. diane
>
>  
>
Hi Diane,

Best wishes on the new job at DOT. Thanks very much for the links to the 
Justice data. I hope you will continue to stay involved in the egov TC 
and the egov-registry SC. We will benefit greatly from your knowledge of 
US Federal data as we get further in our work.
All the best.

-- 
Regards,
Farrukh



>http://www.it.ojp.gov/global/standards/files/xml_data_defs-0.1.0.pdf
>
>http://www.fbi.gov/ucr/nibrs/manuals/conversion.pdf
>
>http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/amberalert/prerelease/1.0.0.0/
>
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: carlmattocks@checkmi.com [mailto:carlmattocks@checkmi.com]
>Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2004 10:47 AM
>To: Farrukh.Najmi@Sun.COM
>Cc: Lewis, Diane; egov-registry@lists.oasis-open.org
>Subject: Re: [egov-registry] Re: eGov regrep eGMS + JUDD
>
>
>Given the opportunity to use the justice data dictionary I vote for :
>
>Mapping the eGMS vocabulary elements * plus elements from the justice data
>dictionary (JUDD) * to Core Components and then use CCRIM work-in-progress
>to map the Core Components version of standard vocabulary to RIM.
>
>To get this started I also propose that  -
>(0) Diane identify the candidate elements from JUDD
>(1) Paul  select the most apprpopriate elements from eGMS plus JUDD
>(2) I [carl] will start the mapping to CC
>(3) Duane will answer the CC mapping questions that I will formulate as I
>attempt the task :-]
>4) Paul will use the Q&A discussions to produce a best practice 'script' 
>for the Technical Note
>
>Ok ... ?
>
>carl
><quote who="Farrukh Najmi">
>  
>
>>Diane.Lewis@usdoj.gov wrote:
>>
>>    
>>
>>>Hi!
>>>I have spent time today doing my homework regarding status of this
>>>initiative.... please let me know how i may offer assistance to
>>>accomplish one or more of the tasks below.   i can offer a "slice of
>>>justice data".. from the global justice data dictionary if information
>>>from others was not forthcoming.    meanwhile i continue my studies of
>>>the registry spec and concepts .... thanks diane
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>Thanks Diane for your generous offer. We would find a "slice of justice
>>data" useful but hold off just until we get off the ground with our
>>first data set (eGMS). Also please feel free to post any questions or
>>suggestions on the registry specs.  Thanks.
>>
>>Reminder to team that I am still seeking input on choosing between the
>>following options for eGMS mapping to ebXML Registry:
>>
>>    
>>
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From: Farrukh.Najmi@Sun.COM [mailto:Farrukh.Najmi@Sun.COM]
>>>Sent: Friday, June 04, 2004 11:30 AM
>>>To: egov-registry@lists.oasis-open.org
>>>Subject: [egov-registry] Re: eGov regrep
>>>Importance: Low
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>We need to identify our goals and scope what we need to produce? Here
>>>are some possible ways to map the eGMS UK metadata in order of
>>>increasing complexity:
>>>
>>>
>>>1. Map the eGMS vocabulary elements it directly to ebRIM as a
>>>ClassificationScheme
>>>
>>>2. Map the eGMS vocabulary elements to Core Components and then use
>>>CCRIM work-in-progress to map the Core Components version of standard
>>>vocabulary to RIM.
>>>
>>>3. Any other ideas?
>>>
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>Team, please share your thoughts on above or ask for clarification.
>>Thanks.
>>
>>--
>>Regards,
>>Farrukh
>>
>>
>>
>>    
>>
>
>
>  
>