Re: [egov-registry] eGov regrep

["Carl Mattocks" <carlmattocks@checkmi.com>]

Farrukh et al :

Apologies for not stating the intent clearly enough. Since, the CCTS
approach is still in its infancy, I predict that the task will take longer
than we would like. Therefore, I propose that to make the best of the
situation, we do -
(1) a FULL direct to ebRIM mapping for the selected e-GMS metdata subset
AND
(2) a FULL mapping to CCTS (and then using CCRIM)  for the selected e-GMS
metdata subset
AND
(3) document the results of BOTH in the Technical Note. ...
and let the reader be aware they have a choice.

Agreed - it would be useful to publish a sample of (2) above. Hopefully,
this can be done in a couple of weeks.

comments ?

cheers
carl

<quote who="Farrukh Najmi">
> Carl Mattocks wrote:
>
>>Paul et al :
>>Given that -
>>(1) the CCTS Registry specification is still embryonic
>>(2) use of a mapping to CCTS and then using CCRIM - can only be a
>>recommendation
>>
>>I propose we [show how to] map all the selected e-GMS metdata subset  -
>>(a) directly to ebRIM (farrukh)
>>(b) to CCTS (carl supported by Duane)
>>
>>
> Hi Carl, any update on when you and Duane will have a sample showing
> approach (b) above for the example metadata at:
>
>
> http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/egov-registry/download.php/7256/SAindividual-2004-v1-0.xsd
>
>
> so we can compare with direct mapping (approach a)  as captured in
> SubmitObjectsRequest_eGMS1.xml:
>
> http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/egov-registry/download.php/7257/SubmitObjectsRequest_eGMS1.xml
>
>
> Lets get the decision done between direct and CCTS indirect mapping to
> ebRIM so we can proceed to the meat of the pilot.
>


-- 
Carl Mattocks

co-Chair OASIS (ISO/TS 15000) ebXMLRegistry Semantic Content SC
co-Chair OASIS Business Centric Methodology TC
CEO CHECKMi
v/f (usa) 908 322 8715
www.CHECKMi.com
Semantically Smart Compendiums
(AOL) IM CarlCHECKMi