Re: [ekmi] is this TC dead?

[Anil Saldhana <Anil.Saldhana@redhat.com>]

Hi Ben,
  the work done is here:
http://docs.oasis-open.org/ekmi/sksml/v1.0/pr01/SKSML-1.0-Specification.html

What is needed is to get to the 3 implementations whose conformance will 
drive the 1.0 specification to public standard....  :)

The odds may be stacked at us. It does not mean we are in a rat race to 
get to public standard. For that to happen, we need conforming 
implementations.

I do recommend you to take up an official role with EKMI (maybe a second 
secretary?) or an editor role to actually move this TC forward. 

Cheers,
Anil

Benjamin Tomhave wrote:
> No visual project in nearly 2 months while other committees in the same
> realm is hardly sensationalizing. ;) If this committee wants to survive
> and be taken seriously, then serious work must be conducted. Or, the
> committee should just concede loss and fold. As it is, the odds are
> strongly stacked against us under the current strategy. If we cannot get
> all the major players onboard and actively engaged, then we need to take
> stock of the work being done and decide whether or not what we're doing is
> the right thing.
>
> fwiw.
>
> -ben
>
> On Mon, June 15, 2009 5:25 pm, Anil Saldhana wrote:
>   
>> I was going to send an email soon (not on the death of the TC) but with
>> updates.
>>
>> I am still learning - do not procrastinate sending emails in this global
>> world. :)
>>
>> While you are at it, can you tell me why you derive such immense
>> pleasure in sensationalizing things via emails? ;)
>>
>> Benjamin Tomhave wrote:
>>     
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I'm just wondering... there's been no activity on the main list here
>>> since
>>> April. I've not seen anything on a monthly call. Is there anything going
>>> on? Or is this TC dead. If it's dead, then perhaps someone should alert
>>> OASIS so that they can call the coroner for cleanup.
>>>
>>> Thank you,
>>>
>>> -ben
>>>
>>>