[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [election-services] OASIS NIST UOCAVA Submission
|
Hi John and all, Just go back on line, so I been
catching up with the discussion. I think the paper is excellent, it is
well balanced and gets over the message that “ standard interface are
critical for trust, transparency and confidence in any electronic electoral system
deployment and EML makes this possible”. Congratulations on the paper, I
hope the conference appreciate it. Regards John Ross From: John Borras
[mailto:johnaborras@yahoo.co.uk] Following a very busy set of exchanges
yesterday I’ve captured in the attached the consensus of the discussions
– I hope! Just to re-state the line we should be
taking IMO is not one of campaigning for and evangelizing evoting but confining
ourselves to just saying we’ve got the technical tools for whatever you
want to do Mr Election Official. Having said that however we do not
support any manipulation of EML to support bad/poor systems/practices so
we need to point/persuade NIST to the good practices in our experiences. Can I have any final text edits by Monday
please and bear in mind that there is a 5 page limit for the submission so
there’s not much room to include a lot of additional material. John |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]