[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [emergency-msg] ICS form req's draft
At 10:02 PM -0400 7/14/03, Allen Wyke wrote: >I think you are making it a "requirement" (as defined by supporting >MUSTs and SHOULDs) without meaning too. No, I definitely meant to. I'm suggesting that the message-management capabilities supported by the referenced elements in CAP would be equally useful in the IB message... and that it would be more appropriate to reuse existing components than to reinvent the wheel. If SHOULD and MUST mean essentially the same thing in this context then please feel free to read this proposal as a MUST. >Don't get me wrong, I would love for CAP to be part of ICS, but I would >caution the approach for v1.0. That's not what's proposed. The proposal is merely that a particular set of elements that also are used in CAP... those that provide for message identification and management... are equally applicable to, and can be reused in, the ICS messages. - Art
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]