OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

emergency message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]

Subject: FW: [oasis-board-comment] Re: [emergency] Re CAP-IPAWS Profile Specification Issues

Forwarding to the list on behalf of Bob Freund.


From: Bob Freund [mailto:bob.freund@hitachisoftware.com]
Sent: Friday, February 20, 2009 4:05 AM
To: Mary McRae
Subject: Fwd: [oasis-board-comment] Re: [emergency] Re CAP-IPAWS Profile Specification Issues



please forward once more.



Begin forwarded message:

From: Bob Freund <bob.freund@hitachisoftware.com>

Date: February 20, 2009 4:04:36 AM EST

To: Renato Iannella <renato@nicta.com.au>

Subject: Re: [oasis-board-comment] Re: [emergency] Re  CAP-IPAWS Profile Specification Issues


1) those email lists are not described in the policy
2) They are not well maintained I particularly like http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-team-outside-activities/2001Apr/0000.html
3) They are not complete for even what they are.
4) There are no W3C contracts or contract details to outside entities described at all even though they are "known" to exist.  This category is also not included in the policy per se.
5) What you might hope to be expectations of an email to a group concerning potential conflict of interest is not discussed at all in either policy, rather that policy describes notification of the Team contact.

I think that there *might* be a set of policies that *may* be appropriate for OASIS to adopt, but the specific policies of the W3C would not have included the disclosure you specifically desire since that action is corporate and not covered by the policies cited.


On Feb 19, 2009, at 11:45 PM, Renato Iannella wrote:


On 20 Feb 2009, at 11:37, Bob Freund wrote:


The W3C Staff / Team member policy:

Covers personal professional work outside of the W3C that may conflict with W3C work.  Disclosure is internal and is only used internally.


Sure - and W3C members can find out about them:




You can even see Tim Berners Lee's disclosures:




The disclosures seem to be one-way, there is no visibility, outside of the director's office, on the nature or content of those disclosures as far as I know.

For example, can you tell what was the date and material content of my last disclosure?


No, the expectation is that people will send email to the group where the conflict might arise.


So, for my information, if OASIS had identical policies to the W3C policies that you reference, what would be the material differences in the events of late?


Disclosure of the "relationship" between OASIS and DHS and the implications to the EMTC.



Cheers...  Renato Iannella






To unsubscribe, e-mail: oasis-board-comment-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org

For additional commands, e-mail: oasis-board-comment-help@lists.oasis-open.org




[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]