Renato,
I am familiar with those policies.
The W3C Staff / Team member policy:
Covers personal professional work outside of the W3C that may conflict with W3C
work. Disclosure is internal and is only used internally.
It is interesting to note that contracts in which the W3C itself are directly
engaged are NOT covered by that policy.
The Individual policy is intended to inform the Director of relationships that
may be a conflict of interest.
The disclosures seem to be one-way, there is no visibility, outside of the
director's office, on the nature or content of those disclosures as far as I
know.
For example, can you tell what was the date and material content of my last
disclosure?
So, for my information, if OASIS had identical policies to the W3C policies
that you reference, what would be the material differences in the events of
late?
thanks
-bob
On Feb 19, 2009, at 8:09 PM, Renato Iannella wrote:
On 20 Feb 2009, at 01:34, Mary McRae wrote:
I'll let Jamie speak for himself,
I look forward to his response.
but as the OASIS TC Administrator it is
my responsibility to ensure that the TC Process Policy is
adhered to.
Agree - but I think that the OASIS policies are missing key
requirements for open/transparent processes.
These are related to conflicts of interests.
Our friends over at W3C have addressed this and I recommend
to OASIS (and the Board) to adopt similar policies asap.
For example, COI policy for members:
<http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/policies.html#coi>
and staff:
<http://www.w3.org/2000/09/06-conflictpolicy>
Cheers... Renato Iannella
NICTA
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: oasis-board-comment-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
For additional commands, e-mail: oasis-board-comment-help@lists.oasis-open.org