[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [emix] Source and Content
In the CIM, a controllability warrant must be submitted with a resource that can be directly controlled. It is imagined that this warrant is useful for resource communications only. It is entirely possible that the name warrant mislead us into including controllability warrants on the list of EMIX warrants. tc "It is the theory that decides what can be observed." - Albert Einstein
From: Anne Hendry [mailto:ahendry@pacbell.net] The 'Content' aspect was originally intended to hold the proportion of the energy that was from the specified 'Source' (how much of the content was green vs. non-green, etc). For various reasons it was probably never implementable that way but nevertheless. ... Happy to keep only source. I assume this is part of Aaron & Toby's warrant rework. Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T From: "Ed Cazalet" <ed@cazalet.com> Date: Sun, 4 Sep 2011 14:48:04 -0700 To: 'William Cox'<wtcox@CoxSoftwareArchitects.com> Cc: <Toby.Considine@gmail.com>; 'Aaron Snyder'<aaron@enernex.com>; <emix@lists.oasis-open.org> Subject: RE: [emix] Source and Content Source of electricity is generally not specific plants but categories such as wind, solar, coal, nuclear, hydro, natural gas sources of electricity. Source certification can take the form of “green certificates” which would be an example of a source warrant. A buyer of electricity would want to know if ownership such certificates are conveyed by a product or are stripped off. A source warrant can make this clear. Otherwise a source warrant may be provided by operators of generators for example. I cannot find any use of “electricity content” but there may be a use. Edward G. Cazalet, Ph.D. 101 First Street, Suite 552 Los Altos, CA 94022 650-949-5274 cell: 408-621-2772 From: William Cox [mailto:wtcox@CoxSoftwareArchitects.com] Hmm. I was going to say drop the source warrant... William Cox
I recommend we can drop the Content Warrant. Edward G. Cazalet, Ph.D. 101 First Street, Suite 552 Los Altos, CA 94022 650-949-5274 cell: 408-621-2772 From: Toby Considine [mailto:tobyconsidine@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Toby Considine The current specification has both Source and Content Warrants. I have been unable to find any definition that distinguishes between these two, and on the CPUC site, they appear to be identical. Any suggestions? The choices are Find a distinguishing definition Delete one or the other. “The single biggest problem in communication is the illusion that it has taken place.”
|
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]