[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: [OASIS Issue Tracker] (ENERGYINTEROP-680) Instrument is Unnecessary
[ https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/ENERGYINTEROP-680?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=80652#comment-80652 ] William Cox commented on ENERGYINTEROP-680: ------------------------------------------- The RES-PROD-INSTR is not clear enough. Needs the refactoring and the description but not in section 1 or 2. Also part of the muddle on market and marketplace (blurred even in those sections). If market for one instruments, can you trade 3 instruments in that market? Market for exchange of a product, Marketplace is at some other level (things I can communicate with? Resource?) Market trades a single product, with constraints on the instruments traded (e.g. five minute intervals). This cross connection needs clarity in the RES-PROD-INSTR space as well as Market-Marketplace. We are not introducing new concepts, but refactoring with more clarity wrt DGH comment. > Instrument is Unnecessary > ------------------------- > > Key: ENERGYINTEROP-680 > URL: https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/ENERGYINTEROP-680 > Project: OASIS Energy Interoperation TC > Issue Type: Bug > Components: cts > Affects Versions: CTSPR01 > Environment: Edward G. Cazalet, TEMIX https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/energyinterop-comment/202111/msg00001/Cazalet_Comments_on_CTS.pdf > Reporter: Toby Considine > Assignee: Toby Considine > Priority: Major > Labels: CLARITY, RES-PROD-INSTR > > 5. The addition of Instrument as a Product for a Duration in the Proposal is unnecessary, and any market engine that requires Instruments can apply the instrument concept in its interface with TEMIX. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.3#803004)
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]