[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: What is Integral?
Makes sense to me. I did a google on “integral tender” and it doesn’t seem to be a term. Integral has different meetings. It can mean the whole of a work, like, “the integral works of an author”, but it seems more common to say, “an integral
part” of something, meaning that this is a part of a bigger whole. So, I find “integral tender” to be ambiguous and think All-or-None would be better.
David From: energyinterop@lists.oasis-open.org <energyinterop@lists.oasis-open.org>
On Behalf Of Considine, Toby I know what an Integral Tender is, because I was there during EI. I was talking today to someone who asked "why don't we use the term "Complete?" I scratched my head, and began searching. The closest I could find was in the CME Group, where there is the term "All-or-None"
And also this (which has a nice discussion of the effects fo such tenders): SO why don't we use the term All-or-None
|
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]