[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: Unwrapping urn:public:...
dcpleland@ftnetwork.com wrote: > Not in the sorts of examples that have been shown in the discussion, to wit: > > "-//Acme//DTD Book//EN" > > Sure, you can overstate anything. Well, okay. But ISO/IEC 10179:1996//DTD DSSSL Architecture//EN is apparently a quite genuine FPI, and it already becomes ISO%2FIEC+101079%3A1996:DTD+DSSSL+Architecture:EN Must it be further bafflegabbed into ISO%2FIEC%20101079%3A1996:DTD%20DSSSL%Architecture:EN or worse yet ISO%2FIEC%20101079%3A1996%2F%2FDTD%20DSSSL%20Architecture%2F%2FEN I think what we have now is a bare minimum for readability. -- There is / one art || John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com> no more / no less || http://www.reutershealth.com to do / all things || http://www.ccil.org/~cowan with art- / lessness \\ -- Piet Hein
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC