[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: RE: HM.VR_AI: Goals and Overview : HumanML_VR_AI Facilitator
-----Original Message-----
From: Rex Brooks [mailto:rexb@starbourne.com]
Sent: Monday, October 08, 2001 3:46 PM
To: Ranjeeth Kumar Thunga; OASIS Comment
Subject: Re: HM.VR_AI: Goals and Overview : HumanML_VR_AI FacilitatorOh For Joy, For Joy!A legitimate disagreement, and I couldn't disagree more. We absolutely must have numerical values as datatypes for many of our elements, particularly the complexClass(es) which will need to deal with a spectrum of values and % or cm or in are all human readable anyway.The simpleClass can be smile/not smile or expression/lack of expression, and that's one level. But smile to be useful for VR, for instance, has to be valued or weighted as to how much of a smile it is to be portrayed as if it is to translated to middleware thence to X3D or any other 3D file format.BTW, it's about time we started having this kind of discussion.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC