RE: HM.frameworks: anew (was HM.VR_AI: Goals and Overview : HumanML_VR_AI Facilitator)

["Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>]

Title: Re: HM.frameworks: anew (was HM.VR_AI: Goals and Over

Excellent catch, Rex.  Wry doesn't belong in that list and for exactly the reasons you

state.   An enumeration should be semantically coherent; that is, all of the members

should be at the same level of semantic choice (point of view).

 

The right habits of inspecting the Schema are emerging. I'm impressed. :-)

 

len

-----Original Message-----
From: Rex Brooks [mailto:rexb@starbourne.com]

I assume we are now discussing facialGesture:smile:?

This means we are now discussing the appearance presented by a human of what we call a smile and how we can describe that appearance, yes?

I suggest that we start with context-neutral descriptions, which most of Ranjeeth's are, except Wry. This is the realm of purely physical description without connotation.

Then we can move on to "interpretations" of those physical descriptions of appearances presented and see what kind of agreement we can get on connotations and intentionality. That's where it starts getting tricky.

That's also where we run into primary and secondary audiences and what meanings get translated from observation into perception.

There's a few thoughts.