Re: [idpf] IDPF name inconsistency

[Chet Ensign <chet.ensign@oasis-open.org>]

Hi Anjali,Â

No need to vote on this because the OASIS rules will now allow the name of a TC to be changed. Other parts of the charter can change but in order to change either the name or the IPR mode of a Technical Committee, you have to close it and start a new one.Â

There is no requirement, however, that the TC name and the spec name be the same. The spec, as an output of the TC, can be whatever name the TC chooses for it. So while there is a difference, it is not a problem of the rules.Â

Best,Â

/chet

On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 4:03âPM Singhai, Anjali <anjali.singhai@intel.com> wrote:

Hi All,

ÂÂ We have a slight inconsistency in the name between the Charter and the Spec for IDPF. Charter has the name âInfrastructure Data-Plane Functionâ and the Spec says the name as âInfrastructure Data Path Functionâ. The name that was agreed on based on the early inception is âInfrastructure Data Path Functionâ.

Â

I recommend we fix the charter to match the Spec name.

Please vote by end of day tomorrow, either to keep the name as âInfrastructure Data Path Functionâ or âInfrastructure Data-Plane functionâ

Â

Thanks

Anjali

--

ChetÂEnsign

Chief Technical Community Steward

OASIS Open

Â

Â

Â

	+1 201-341-1393
	chet.ensign@oasis-open.org
	www.oasis-open.org