[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: suggested motion on approving the KMIP V1.1 Differences as Committee Note
Hi again –
Here’s the TC process section on announcing Committee Notes:
After approving a Committee Note, a Technical Committee may notify the TC Administrator for publishing the Committee Note to the OASIS Library and announcing its publication to the OASIS membership.
Since the KMIP V1.1 Differences doc is non-standards track, we have the option of a very simple approach to making it a Committee Note (from the TC Process):
“Non-Standards Track Work Products may directly be approved as Committee Notes by the Technical Committees via a Full Majority vote. Public reviews are optional for Committee Notes”.
We could do this by voice vote, but I think it probably is better to have a ballot so that voting members not in the call have a chance to participate in the ballot. So I suggest we consider something like this in today’s TC call:
“(name) moves that the co-chairs create a 10-day Full Majority Vote ballot to approve ”KMIP V1.1 Differences wd02” asa Committee Note and request the co-chairs to submit a request for OASIS to publish this Committee Note.”