Re: [legalcitem-legislation] Usecases-Monica-May2015-MOKedits

[monica.palmirani <monica.palmirani@unibo.it>]

Dear John,

I propose to put all the technical information in the annexes, also because Fabio said several time in the main TC calls that the syntactical/technical issues are in the scope of the technical sub-committee.

Second I propose to balance the space dedicate to each pilot case in order to have an harmonized/compact/synthetic presentation of each pilot case.

Finally I propose in the conclusion a table of comparison of the main mandatory and optional elements that are necessary in the legislative domain.

What do you think?
Thanks for your answer that permits me to go ahead during the week-end on the document.

Yours,
Monica



Il 14/05/2015 22:58, John Dann ha scritto:

Dear Monica 

I am a bit puzzled by your comments and do not understand the way you are proposing now. 

I adapted mainly the Luxembourg use case in the document you promised because you copy pasted it from the document I provided back in January, but without any screen shots. So the text you copied was quite difficult to understand. So I just adapted a text which was already there. 

So in my opinion there is no change ... 

I think we could summarize (extract the juice) at the end of each use case the essential building blocks which are used ... Which could help partially to found common grounds. 

But a lot of information will be in metadata and for that it my will important to analyze different standard and find common blocks also. 

So again I have not changed the structure of your document .... 

If you propose another way now , please adapt the stature then

Good night, 

John 

Sent from my iPhone

On 14 mai 2015, at 22:40, monica.palmirani <monica.palmirani@unibo.it> wrote:

Dear John,

thank you for your contributions. If I understand well you propose to adopt a very detailed version of each pilot case. Is it correct? However, as I explained in the last call, the original idea was to summarize the main pillars of each pilot case so as to produce a survey that will be useful for the technical committee.

We need to decide about these issues soon. We have two options:
1. extract the juice of each pilot case and then examine them in a comparative analysis;
2. include all the details of the other pilot cases.

I am trying to follow the first approach, you have followed the second one.

For instance, it is not necessary to explain FRBR model in this document. This is a technical requirement (see the wiki of the technical sub-group), and FRBR is also part of many other pilot cases (e.g. Metalex/CEN, URN:LEX, AKN). We can move it in the section about the general requirement if you feel like.

Secondarily, when the subcommittees were formed, the chairs asked each of them (except the technical subcommittee) not to discuss in any detail the syntax of the examples, because it would be out of scope of the content subcommittees. Therefore I suggest we put the detailed and syntactic example you produced as an annex of our document.

In any case let me know what you prefer: if you insist in the first approach I will integrate the material of all the other pilot cases in a proper and balanced manner, even if I am personally against such a long and dispersive method to collect material. Personally, I strongly prefer a more abstract and compact narrative for our document.

Yours,
Monica


Il 14/05/2015 11:29, John Dann ha scritto:

Dear all,

 Here is my input,

John 

From: Melanie Knapp <moberlin@gmu.edu>
Date: 13 mai 2015 19:21:11 UTC+2
To: "'legalcitem-legislation@lists.oasis-open.org'" <legalcitem-legislation@lists.oasis-open.org>
Subject: [legalcitem-legislation] Usecases-Monica-May2015-MOKedits

Hi All,

I wanted to get this to John as soon as possible. I have added the ELI examples for France and EU. John, you are next to edit your existing examples – you mentioned wanting to edit Luxembourg, for example.

I will work on parts 4 and 5 separately, and insert them into the next version that is mailed back around.

Monica – can we include tables in OASIS documents? Some of the information in the France and EU materials was originally in table format, but I didn’t know if I could put in a table.

 

Thanks all!  Have a great weekend!

 

Melanie

-- 
===================================
Associate professor of Legal Informatics 
School of Law
Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna 
C.I.R.S.F.I.D. http://www.cirsfid.unibo.it/ 
Palazzo Dal Monte Gaudenzi - Via Galliera, 3 
I - 40121 BOLOGNA (ITALY) 
Tel +39 051 277217 
Fax +39 051 260782 
E-mail  monica.palmirani@unibo.it 
====================================

-- 
===================================
Associate professor of Legal Informatics 
School of Law
Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna 
C.I.R.S.F.I.D. http://www.cirsfid.unibo.it/ 
Palazzo Dal Monte Gaudenzi - Via Galliera, 3 
I - 40121 BOLOGNA (ITALY) 
Tel +39 051 277217 
Fax +39 051 260782 
E-mail  monica.palmirani@unibo.it 
====================================